Friday, June 3, 2011

Thumbs Up on Pierce Transit Service Reductions

Pierce Transit’s proposed Service Reduction Plan (pdf) for October is a shift towards efficiency, economic sustainability, and long-term growth potential.  While service cuts are tough on everyone, Pierce Transit is striving to do the least harm to the general ridership.  Here are the highlights.

Death to Peanut Butter
It’s time to give Pierce Transit a hand on this one.  It takes courage to say “enough is enough” to the ‘peanut butter’ approach to transit service, which hurts urban riders and leads to costs that spiral out of control.  This plan helps the agency to turn the page and set a new course – making long overdue cuts to inefficient routes with low ridership and high costs per rider.  Routing on the Key Peninsula, in Bonney Lake, Orting, and Sumner is discontinued.  The reduction plan at the same time does its best to spare highly used urban routes in Pierce County serving Tacoma, Lakewood, University Place, and Puyallup.



There’s likely to be political fallout from this plan.  One should expect Bonney Lake, Buckley, and Dupont to call for the taxing boundary to be redrawn.  Written public comment is due by today, June 3.  The hearing is on June 13th at 4pm at PT HQ.  More after the jump.


Introducing Peak and Off-Peak Schedules
Pierce Transit has operated for a long while on the same standard half hour service profile using timed transfer centers.  The timed transfers remain for the moment on most routes arriving at transit centers, since Pierce Transit is forced to cut service and connections can only be guaranteed this way.  However, instead of making the cuts across the whole system, midday service is downscaled a bit with a shortening of the evening service span to retain usable service frequency during the day.  At this point in time it is a good exchange, which can be built upon with more service hours.

Network focusing on Key Service Corridors
From a network perspective there’s a lot to love.  Many changes, especially in the North End of Tacoma, greatly improve service and retain neighborhood geographic coverage in novel ways; even though the raw number of service hours are being cut.
 

For example, in addition to serving all previous destinations like the Stadium and Proctor Districts and Point Defiance, Route 11 will now serve Tacoma General Hospital, Jason Lee Middle School, the 6th Avenue Business District, and the University of Puget Sound.  On top of that, this routing configuration produces a combined service corridor between the Proctor District and 6th Avenue along Union Avenue with Route 51.  

Another combined service corridor is created between Sprague Avenue and Union Avenue on 6th with Route 1.   This configuration helps to benefit shorter transit trips and inter-district trips with higher service frequency.  In the future, this could position the corner of 6th and Union to turn into a high profile on-street transfer point.

Further, a reconfigured Route 13 joins its sisters in the Proctor District for a full hub of Routes 11, 13, 16, and 51.  This grants the riders of the Proctor District access to the Old Town/Ruston Way Waterfront, Thea Foss Waterway, and Tacoma Dome Station and accelerates trips made to Downtown Tacoma made from West Tacoma.  Not bad for a 15% service reduction.

Not all Roses for Tacoma
It isn’t all roses, though for Tacoma.  Here are the full route causalities limited to the City:
Route 220 (Orchard St.), Route 59 (Manitou), Route 26 (MLK Jr. Way), Route 61 (NE Tacoma), and Route 603A (Olympia).

Work remains to be done
Something about that service donut doesn't look right.
Despite all that I’ve said, there’s still some remnants of the suburban model should die alongside the other cuts.  Service on S. 224th street to the Mountain Highway Wal-Mart would create a service donut hole bordered by Pacific Avenue, 112th St. and Meridian.  I have told staff to consider shifting those service hours to Route 410, which was programmed to become part of a 15 minute trunk route in Proposition 1.
Next, Route 501, which seems to exist primarily for the purpose of giving residents of Milton (pop. 6786) access to Downtown Tacoma, should be merged with the service hours which link Downtown Tacoma with Federal Way.  This would help to retain comparable service levels to King County Metro's Rapid Ride service to Federal Way Transit Center, while enforcing the Board-encouraged direction of using more direct paths between vital urban centers for fixed route service.

Route 51, in the combination with Route 220, is still missing a vital connection with the Tacoma Mall.  Lots of young people use this route to commute to work each day.  Many of my fellow riders I speak with tell me, "That's the whole point of the 51," and I tend to agree with them.

Finally, I’ve recommended to staff that the following routes be renamed to indicate their new configurations.
Route 11:   Point Defiance via 6th Ave
Route 13:   UPS - Waterfront - T Dome
Route 16:   Proctor District - TCC

In summary
This is a good move for Pierce Transit and with all of the changes to routing and scheduling, in the long run it will be good for greater Tacoma.  It in many ways turns the tables on communities that voted for more efficiency over more revenues during the debate over Proposition 1.  Expect that a redrawing of the Pierce Transit boundary to either start discussion of additional service cuts (amounting to $4m) and/or another ballot measure to seek full funding in 2012.

6 comments:

  1. Chris
    I really like the changes to route 13. Using Dock st to get the TDome should speed up that route, plus make it one of the more scenic bus routes in the system.

    Having the 11 part way up 6th is also great.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The changes to Route 13 were mainly to ensure that the majority of the North End is still served by transit, whatever the route configurations. I believe that this route will assist in serving the 4th of July and other festivals on the waterfront - beerfest, Tall Ships, Working Waterfront, Art Walk, etc.

    There are still a slew of capital improvements needed to get this system up to some kind of design standard. For instance, I was just down in Olympia an their Route 41, which is a critical route to the Evergreen State College, has bus bulbs at practically every urban stop. That really helps to speed up loading and unloading, while keeping the ride smooth. It would be great to address deficiencies like that along critical routes.

    The route network in the North End looks pretty good. We could use some service hours to bolster it, especially night service, but that'll come in time.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Shifting the 501 service onto route 500 isnt that bad of an idea actually. A good part of fife and milton would loose service, but i would think that Pac hwy is more productive. If you did, i'd shift the 402 onto the old 501 by turning on 360th to 28th at Enchanted Pkwy. Also, if funds permit i'd like to see the 400 extended out to atleast 136th if not 175th on meridian to double service on that busy stretch of meridian. Finally, i think some routes need to be combined and operated under one route number, even if only at the current headways to provide more "through" service. This includes the 57 & 300 (& 206 if service is ever shifted away from the mall to Lakewood Station), 204 & 410, 202 & 409, 52 & 55, and Mabye the 28 & 100 (Shorten the 100 down to Gig Harbor, have a revised 112 Peacock Hill BusPlus or an extended 113 Key Penninsula BusPlus to serve Gig Harbor-Purdy, if its even worth it. Plus you'd have some short turns on the 28 at TCC as well but you'd have an all day through route to/from the Penninsula to Downtown Tacoma). Even though you'd have a cost to change the bus stop signs, this would be good for the riders as there would be more through options and one seat rides, plus its "good" PR to show "shrinkage" even though you're still covering the same area. As for east county i can expect that Sumner and bonney lake will want ST to pick up the slack, especally if they remove themselves from the PTBA in the future. Sumner is easy with a couple of added stops on the 578, however Bonney Lake?

    ReplyDelete
  4. The lack of late night service just hit home. Doesn't look like I'll be using PT to get home after 7PM anytime soon.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @Tacoma1

    Don't despair, this is only a temporary situation. Painful, but temporary. The next ballot measure will likely restore late night service and deepen changes that were set forth in the October service cuts.

    I think you're totally right about the need for Sound Transit to take over a lot of East Pierce service. Sounder connectors shouldn't really be Pierce Transit's deal - they should be Sound Transit's.

    ReplyDelete
  6. How does completely cutting off NE Tacoma to the rest of Tacoma proper benefit or help? We may be across the bay, but we ARE part of the City of Tacoma and pay taxes just like every other resident of the City of Tacoma, and there's no other public transportation options that don't take two hours to get there... Pierce Transit could at least keep a reduced ridership during the weekdays, but don't cut us off completely.

    ReplyDelete